Programa de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos en un Servicio de Medicina Intensiva: análisis retrospectivo observacional de los resultados 15 meses después de su implementación / Antimicrobial stewardship program in an Intensive Care Unit: A retrospective observational analysis of the results 15 months after its implementation

Objetivo. Determinar el grado de aceptación de un Pro grama de Optimización del Uso de Antimicrobianos (PROA) en un Servicio de Medicina Intensiva (SMI), y evaluar su efecto sobre el consumo de antibióticos, indicadores de calidad y re sultados clínicos. Pacientes y métodos. Descripción retrospectiva de las intervenciones propuestas por un PROA. Comparación de uso de antimicrobianos, indicadores de calidad y seguridad frente a un periodo sin PROA. Se realizó en un SMI polivalente de un Hospital Universitario mediano (600 camas). Se estudió a pacientes ingresados por cualquier causa en el SMI durante el periodo PROA en los que se hubiera obtenido una muestra di rigida al diagnóstico de una potencial infección, o se hubieran iniciado antimicrobianos. Se elaboraron recomendaciones no impositivas para mejorar la prescripción antimicrobiana (es tructura audit and feedback) y se procedió a su registro du rante periodo PROA (15 meses, octubre 2018–diciembre 2019). Comparación de indicadores en un periodo con PROA (abril– junio 2019) y sin PROA (abril–junio 2018). Resultados. Se emitieron 241 recomendaciones sobre 117 pacientes, el 67% de ellas de tipo desescalada terapéutica. La aceptación de las recomendaciones fue elevada (96.3%). En el periodo PROA se redujo el número medio de antibióticos por paciente (3.3±4.1 vs 2.4±1.7, p=0.04) y los días de tratamiento (155 DOT/100 PD vs 94 DOT/100 PD, p <0.01) (AU)

Objective. We aim to evaluate the adherence rate to an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and to assess its effect on the use of antibiotics, quality indicators and clinical outcomes. Patients and methods. Retrospective description of the interventions proposed by the ASP. We compared antimi crobial use, quality and safety indicators in an ASP versus a non-ASP period. The study was performed in a polyvalent ICU of a medium-size University Hospital (600 beds). We studied patients admitted to the ICU for any cause during the ASP pe riod, provided that a microbiological sample aiming to diag nose a potential infection has been drawn, or antibiotics have been started. We elaborated and registered of non-mandatory recommendations to improve antimicrobial prescription (audit and feedback structure) and its registry during the ASP peri od (15 months, October 2018-December 2019). We compared indicators in a period with ASP (April-June 2019) and without ASP (April-June 2018). Results. We issued 241 recommendations on 117 pa tients, 67% of them classified as de-escalation type. The rate of adherence to the recommendations was high (96.3%). In the ASP period, the mean number of antibiotics per patient (3.3±4.1 vs 2.4±1.7, p=0.04) and the days of treatment (155 DOT/100 PD vs 94 DOT/100 PD, p <0.01) (AU)

Influence of HLADQA1*05 Genotype in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Anti-TNF Treatment With Proactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Carriers of the human leucocyte antigen variant HLADQA1*05 (rs2097432) are at risk of developing antibodies against infliximab and adalimumab with reduced tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist persistence. The impact of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (PTDM) on this association has been barely assessed. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study including patients with inflammatory bowel disease starting anti-TNF therapy between January 2017 and March 2021. Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring was defined as periodic drug level measurement (≥2 determinations during the first year of treatment and ≥1/annual determination during the following years), regardless of clinical condition, followed by dose optimization. Variables associated with treatment persistence were assessed with multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were included, 52 (46.4%) HLA-DQA1*05 carriers, with a median follow-up of 73.9 (interquartile range, 35.4-133.1) weeks. Combination therapy with thiopurines was more frequent among HLA-DQA1*05 noncarriers (28 [46.7%] vs 12 [23.1%]; P = .01). Clinical remission rates at week 14 (77.9% vs 73.9%; P = .69) and 56 (73.2% vs 68.4%; P = .64) were similar between HLA-DQA1*05 noncarriers and carriers. Drug persistence was higher among HLA-DQA1*05 carriers (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.71; P = .01). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified systemic steroids at anti-TNF initiation (HR, 4; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-9.7) as a risk factor and HLA-DQA1*05 carriers (HR, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.81) as a protective factor of treatment cessation. CONCLUSION: In adult patients with PTDM, a positive HLA-DQA1*05 genotype does not associate a higher risk of treatment cessation nor worse clinical outcomes.

This is a retrospective cohort study including 112 inflammatory bowel disease patients starting anti-TNF therapy under proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (PTDM). The HLA-DQA1*05 carriers did not present lower drug persistence or remission rates, suggesting PTDM overcomes the reduced treatment survival expected in HLA-DQA1*05 carriers.